About
No name.
No agency. No fluff.
1811 Blueprint is written by a serving federal criminal investigator and supervisor who has sat as a rater on hiring panels. The work stands on its own or it doesn't stand.
Why the name stays off the page
Currently serving federal agents do not get to build a personal brand on the side. There are rules about outside activity, rules about speaking for an agency, and a very good operational reason not to put your face on the internet when your job involves people who would rather you didn't.
So: no name, no agency, no seal, no photographs. Nothing here is published on behalf of any federal agency, and nothing here is an official position of anyone but the person writing it.
What that costs you is the ability to Google me. What it buys you is somebody still inside the process, still sitting on panels, telling you how it actually works instead of how it worked a decade ago.
The short version of the story
Almost ten years as a cop, most of it desperate to get out of patrol and into federal work. Four years of applications across nearly every agency that hires the 1811 series. A written test, a physical task test, a panel, a polygraph, a background — over and over, at agency after agency.
Four offers or near-offers before the one I took. One of them came only because I cold-called a field office with no recruiter and got an agent on the phone who told me you couldn't get hired without knowing somebody — and then, twenty minutes into the conversation, nominated me himself.
I also failed a polygraph outright at one agency, and went inconclusive twice at another before passing on the third attempt. I carry a badge and supervise agents today. That is not a war story, it's the single most useful thing I can tell an applicant who is quietly convinced they've already disqualified themselves.
Why this site exists
When I was applying, the only real resource was a handful of internet forums where applicants traded intel. That community is the reason I didn't quit. There is still no good, current, honest map of this process — so I'm writing one.
The other reason is what I've seen from the rater's chair. Qualified people — good cops, good service members, people who would have been excellent agents — lose this process on preparation, not on merit. A missing parenthetical. An interview answer that stopped one sentence short. A polygraph pre-interview handled with shame instead of facts.
Those are all fixable, and none of them are secret. They're just untaught.
What you won't find here
- Anything about defeating, beating or gaming any part of a federal screening process. Not the polygraph, not the background, not the test. The advice here is preparation and radical honesty, full stop.
- Protected material — actual scoring rubrics, actual test content, actual internal documents. I'll teach you the principle behind a scale. I won't hand you the scale.
- Guarantees. Nobody can sell you a federal job, and anyone claiming to is worth exactly what they charge.
- Fabricated credibility. No testimonials until real ones exist, no logos I have no right to, no invented statistics.
How to use it
Start with the free checklist — it's the map. Read the field notes for the gate you're standing in front of right now. If your resume is the thing between you and a referral, the Resume Pack is the two-page template plus worked examples, and a review gets my eyes on yours.
And keep training. The physical test is the only part of this process where they hand you the answers in advance.
Start here